Blake Lesselroth to Humans
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Blake Lesselroth has written about Humans.
Connection Strength
1.271
-
Teaching and Evaluating the Virtual Physical Exam in Telemedicine. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2024 Aug 22; 316:1519-1523.
Score: 0.054
-
Usability Checklists for Health Technology: Case Study and Experts' Opinions. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2024 Aug 22; 316:1074-1078.
Score: 0.054
-
Tabular, Annotated, Visual, or Trends + Contextual Information? Preferences for Online Laboratory Results Displays. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2024 Jan 25; 310:1041-1045.
Score: 0.052
-
Teledermatology: Simulating Hybrid Workflows for Telemedicine Education. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2024 Jan 25; 310:1176-1180.
Score: 0.052
-
Simulating Telemedicine, Medication Reconciliation, and Social Determinants: A Novel Instructional Approach to Health Systems Competencies. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2024 Jan 25; 310:1201-1205.
Score: 0.052
-
Assessing Telemedicine Competencies: Developing and Validating Learner Measures for Simulation-Based Telemedicine Training. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2023; 2023:474-483.
Score: 0.051
-
Automation vs. Innovation: Unexplored Strategies to Improve Virtual Care. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2023 Jun 22; 304:3-7.
Score: 0.049
-
Identifying Failure Modes in Telemedicine: An Instructional Needs Assessment. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2023 Jun 22; 304:39-43.
Score: 0.049
-
A Telepsychiatry Simulation for Suicide Assessment: Teaching Telemedicine Safety Competencies. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2022; 2022:700-708.
Score: 0.049
-
Interprofessional survey on medication reconciliation activities in the US Department of Veterans' Affairs: development and validation of an Implementation Readiness Questionnaire. BMJ Open Qual. 2022 10; 11(4).
Score: 0.047
-
Hidden in Plain Sight: Overlooked Results and Other Errors in Evaluating Online Laboratory Results. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2022 Jun 06; 290:867-871.
Score: 0.046
-
Why Do People Use Online Lab Results and What Do They Look For: A Qualitative Study. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2022 May 25; 294:599-603.
Score: 0.046
-
Using Simulations to Train Medical Students for Unanticipated Technology Failures in Telemedicine. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2022 May 25; 294:775-779.
Score: 0.046
-
Teaching Teledermatology: A Simulation Pilot for Health Professional Students. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2022 May 25; 294:953-954.
Score: 0.046
-
Teaching Medical Students Health Care Failure Mode and Effect Analysis: A Case Study of Inpatient Pain Management Computerized Decision Support. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2021; 2021:707-715.
Score: 0.045
-
Opportunities to Improve COVID-19 Dashboard Designs for the Public. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2021 Nov 08; 286:16-20.
Score: 0.044
-
Information Chaos: An Adapted Framework Describing Citizens' Experiences with Information During COVID-19. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2021 Nov 08; 286:26-30.
Score: 0.044
-
Student Academy: A Pilot Design Thinking Workshop to Teach Community Medicine. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2021 Nov 08; 286:79-83.
Score: 0.044
-
A User Experience and eHealth Literacy Inspection of a Lab Test Interpretation Mobile App for Citizens. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2021 May 27; 281:947-951.
Score: 0.043
-
Designing Shift Handoff Software: Clinical Learners and Design Students Collaborate Using the "Design Thinking" Process. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2021 May 27; 281:974-978.
Score: 0.043
-
Narratives and Stories: Novel Approaches to Improving Patient-Facing Information Resources and Patient Engagement. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019 Aug 09; 265:175-180.
Score: 0.038
-
Evaluation of Multimedia Medication Reconciliation Software: A Randomized Controlled, Single-Blind Trial to Measure Diagnostic Accuracy for Discrepancy Detection. Appl Clin Inform. 2018 04; 9(2):285-301.
Score: 0.035
-
Implementation of a Medication Reconciliation Assistive Technology: A Qualitative Analysis. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2017; 2017:1802-1811.
Score: 0.035
-
Naturalistic Usability Testing of Inpatient Medication Reconciliation Software. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017; 234:201-205.
Score: 0.032
-
Usability Evaluation of a Medication Reconciliation and Allergy Review (MRAR) Kiosk: A Methodological Approach for Analyzing User Interactions. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015; 218:61-67.
Score: 0.027
-
Design of admission medication reconciliation technology: a human factors approach to requirements and prototyping. HERD. 2013; 6(3):30-48.
Score: 0.024
-
Addressing the sociotechnical drivers of quality improvement: a case study of post-operative DVT prophylaxis computerised decision support. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011 May; 20(5):381-9.
Score: 0.021
-
Primary care provider perceptions and use of a novel medication reconciliation technology. Inform Prim Care. 2011; 19(2):105-18.
Score: 0.021
-
Using consumer-based kiosk technology to improve and standardize medication reconciliation in a specialty care setting. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2009 May; 35(5):264-70.
Score: 0.019
-
Design and implementation of a medication reconciliation kiosk: the Automated Patient History Intake Device (APHID). J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009 May-Jun; 16(3):300-4.
Score: 0.018
-
Technological Literacy as a Framework for Health Professions Education in the Digital Era. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2024 Aug 22; 316:1500-1504.
Score: 0.013
-
Differential Perceptions of What Constitutes a Medical Error Associated with Electronic Medical Records. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2023 Jun 22; 304:21-25.
Score: 0.012
-
Challenges and Best Practices in Ethical Review of Human and Organizational Factors Studies in Health Technology: a Synthesis of Testimonies. Yearb Med Inform. 2020 Aug; 29(1):58-70.
Score: 0.010
-
Beyond technology acceptance to effective technology use: a parsimonious and actionable model. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 May; 22(3):718-29.
Score: 0.007
-
Evaluating an insulin infusion protocol in an acute care setting. Clin Nurse Spec. 2011 Sep-Oct; 25(5):237-43.
Score: 0.005