THIS IS A DEVELOPMENT VERSION OF PROFILES. PLEASE GO TO THE PRODUCTION ENVIRONMENT FOR UPDATES

Header Logo

Connection

Zachary Smith to Treatment Outcome

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Zachary Smith has written about Treatment Outcome.
Zachary Smith
Connection Strength
1.437
Treatment Outcome
  1. Letter to the Editor Regarding "The Potential Negative Effects of Smoking on Cervical and Lumbar Surgery Beyond Pseudarthrosis: A Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative Study". World Neurosurg. 2023 Nov; 179:248.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.135
  2. Fatty infiltration in cervical flexors and extensors in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy using a multi-muscle segmentation model. PLoS One. 2021; 16(6):e0253863.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.115
  3. Magnetization Transfer Ratio and Morphometrics of the Spinal Cord Associates with Surgical Recovery in Patients with Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy. World Neurosurg. 2020 12; 144:e939-e947.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.109
  4. Assessing hand dysfunction in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. PLoS One. 2019; 14(10):e0223009.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.102
  5. Machine Learning for the Prediction of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Post Hoc Pilot Study of 28 Participants. World Neurosurg. 2019 Jul; 127:e436-e442.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.098
  6. Response to the Letter: Predictors for Airway Complications Following Single or Multilevel Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 09 15; 42(18):E1095-E1096.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.088
  7. Minimally invasive thoracic decompression for multi-level thoracic pathologies. J Clin Neurosci. 2014 Mar; 21(3):467-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.066
  8. Measuring surgical outcomes in cervical spondylotic myelopathy patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: assessment of minimum clinically important difference. PLoS One. 2013; 8(6):e67408.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.066
  9. Outcomes in critical care delivery at Jimma University Specialised Hospital, Ethiopia. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2013 May; 41(3):363-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.065
  10. Achievement of Endoscopic Remission After Induction Reduces Hospitalization Burden in Crohn's Disease: Findings From a Pooled Post Hoc Analysis of Risankizumab and Upadacitinib Phase III Trials. J Crohns Colitis. 2025 Feb 04; 19(2).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  11. Real-World Treatment Patterns and Outcomes in Patients With Bacillus Calmette-Gu?rin-Unresponsive High-Risk Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Multicountry Medical Chart Review. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2025 Jun; 23(3):102313.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  12. Dedicated linear accelerator radiosurgery for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia. J Neurosurg. 2003 Sep; 99(3):511-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  13. Importance of valid, reliable, and responsive outcome measures for lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine J. 2023 03; 23(3):345-349.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  14. Advanced Endoscopic Techniques for the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cancer and Management of Biliary and GastricOutlet Obstruction. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2021 10; 30(4):639-656.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  15. Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair Versus Open Repair: Analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank. J Surg Res. 2020 01; 245:179-182.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  16. Quantitative Magnetization Transfer MRI Measurements of the Anterior Spinal Cord Region are Associated With Clinical Outcomes in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 05 15; 43(10):675-680.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  17. Comparing Short-term Complications of Inpatient Versus Outpatient Single-level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: An Analysis of 6940 Patients Using the ACS-NSQIP Database. Clin Spine Surg. 2018 02; 31(1):43-47.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  18. Safety and efficacy of lumen-apposing metal stents with?and?without simultaneous double-pigtail plastic stents?for?draining pancreatic pseudocyst. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 May; 87(5):1248-1255.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  19. An Outcome and Cost Analysis Comparing Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Intraoperative Fluoroscopy versus Computed Tomography-Guided Navigation. World Neurosurg. 2016 Oct; 94:255-260.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  20. Impact of Resident Participation on Outcomes After Single-Level Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion: An Analysis of 3265 Patients from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Mar; 41(5):E289-96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  21. Trigeminal and sphenopalatine ganglion stimulation for intractable craniofacial pain--case series and literature review. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2016 Mar; 158(3):513-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  22. Management of delayed posttraumatic cervical kyphosis. J Clin Neurosci. 2016 Jan; 23:152-159.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  23. Comparison of open and minimally invasive surgery for intradural-extramedullary spine tumors. Neurosurg Focus. 2015 Aug; 39(2):E11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  24. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) for Spondylolisthesis in 282 Patients: In Situ Arthrodesis versus Reduction. World Neurosurg. 2015 Jul; 84(1):108-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  25. Intraoperative and perioperative complications in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a review of 513 patients. J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 May; 22(5):487-95.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  26. Lateral transpsoas lumbar interbody fusion: outcomes and deformity correction. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2014 Apr; 25(2):353-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  27. Intraoperative navigation in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and lateral interbody fusion. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2014 Apr; 25(2):377-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  28. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF): surgical technique, long-term 4-year prospective outcomes, and complications compared with an open TLIF cohort. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2014 Apr; 25(2):279-304.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  29. Minimally invasive treatment of thoracic disc herniations. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2014 Apr; 25(2):271-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  30. Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for thoracolumbar fractures. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2014 Apr; 25(2):337-46.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  31. The effect of surgical level on self-reported clinical outcomes after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: L4-L5 versus L5-S1. World Neurosurg. 2014 Jan; 81(1):177-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  32. Outcome following unilateral versus bilateral instrumentation in patients undergoing minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a single-center randomized prospective study. Neurosurg Focus. 2013 Aug; 35(2):E13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  33. Clinical outcomes of microendoscopic foraminotomy and decompression in the cervical spine. World Neurosurg. 2014 Feb; 81(2):422-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  34. Complications associated with the treatment for spinal ependymomas. Neurosurg Focus. 2011 Oct; 31(4):E13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  35. The surgical technique of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Sci. 2011 Sep; 55(3):259-64.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  36. Non-audiofacial morbidity after Gamma Knife surgery for vestibular schwannoma. Neurosurg Focus. 2009 Dec; 27(6):E4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  37. Novalis Shaped Beam Radiosurgery of arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg. 2004 Nov; 101 Suppl 3:425-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  38. Noninvasive linear accelerator radiosurgery as the primary treatment for trigeminal neuralgia. Neurology. 2004 Feb 24; 62(4):660-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.

THIS IS A DEVELOPMENT VERSION OF PROFILES. PLEASE GO TO THE PRODUCTION ENVIRONMENT FOR UPDATES