THIS IS A DEVELOPMENT VERSION OF PROFILES. PLEASE GO TO THE PRODUCTION ENVIRONMENT FOR UPDATES

Header Logo

Connection

Michael Gold to Risk Factors

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Michael Gold has written about Risk Factors.
Connection Strength

0.207
  1. Gynecologic Oncology Group risk groups for vulvar carcinoma: improvement in survival in the modern era. Gynecol Oncol. 2007 Sep; 106(3):521-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  2. Cadet basic training: an ethnographic study of stress and coping. Mil Med. 2000 Feb; 165(2):147-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  3. A contemporary analysis of epidemiology and management of vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 May; 208(5):410.e1-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  4. Tubal ligation frequency in Oklahoma women with cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Nov; 127(2):278-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  5. Heterogeneity of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia related to HPV16: implications for natural history and management. Int J Cancer. 2013 Jan 01; 132(1):148-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  6. Clinical and pathological heterogeneity of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3. PLoS One. 2012; 7(1):e29051.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  7. Vulvar cancer in young women: demographic features and outcome evaluation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Jun; 200(6):645.e1-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  8. Human papillomavirus cofactors by disease progression and human papillomavirus types in the study to understand cervical cancer early endpoints and determinants. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009 Jan; 18(1):113-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  9. Salvage of isolated vaginal recurrences in women with surgical stage I endometrial cancer: a multiinstitutional experience. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2007 Jul-Aug; 17(4):886-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  10. A comparison of stages IB1 and IB2 cervical cancers treated with radical hysterectomy. Is size the real difference? Gynecol Oncol. 2004 Oct; 95(1):70-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  11. Surgical-pathological predictors of disease-free survival and risk groupings for IB2 cervical cancer: do the traditional models still apply? Gynecol Oncol. 2004 Aug; 94(2):249-55.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.

THIS IS A DEVELOPMENT VERSION OF PROFILES. PLEASE GO TO THE PRODUCTION ENVIRONMENT FOR UPDATES