Michael Cookson to Biopsy, Needle
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Michael Cookson has written about Biopsy, Needle.
Connection Strength
0.734
-
Prediction of tumour volume and pathological stage in radical prostatectomy specimens is not improved by taking more prostate needle-biopsy cores. BJU Int. 2001 Nov; 88(7):722-6.
Score: 0.190
-
Update on transrectal ultrasound-guided needle biopsy of the prostate. Mol Urol. 2000; 4(3):93-7; discussion 99.
Score: 0.167
-
Correlation between Gleason score of needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen: accuracy and clinical implications. J Urol. 1997 Feb; 157(2):559-62.
Score: 0.137
-
Percent of cancer in the biopsy set predicts pathological findings after prostatectomy. J Urol. 2002 May; 167(5):2032-5; discussion 2036.
Score: 0.049
-
Repeat transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: a strategy to improve the reliability of needle biopsy grading in patients with well-differentiated prostate cancer. Urology. 1998 Oct; 52(4):659-62.
Score: 0.038
-
Incidence and clinical significance of false-negative sextant prostate biopsies. J Urol. 1998 Apr; 159(4):1247-50.
Score: 0.037
-
Clinical significance of repeat sextant biopsies in prostate cancer patients. Urology. 1997 Mar; 49(3A Suppl):113-8.
Score: 0.034
-
Optimization of initial prostate biopsy in clinical practice: sampling, labeling and specimen processing. J Urol. 2013 Jun; 189(6):2039-46.
Score: 0.026
-
Association of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, prostate specific antigen and prostate volume. J Urol. 2009 May; 181(5):2064-70.
Score: 0.020
-
Comparison of american joint committee on cancer pathological stage T2a versus T2b urothelial carcinoma: analysis of patient outcomes in organ confined bladder cancer. J Urol. 2009 Feb; 181(2):540-5; discussion 546.
Score: 0.019
-
Significance of atypical and suspicious small acinar proliferations, and high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia on prostate biopsy: implications for cancer detection and biopsy strategy. J Urol. 2006 Mar; 175(3 Pt 1):929-33; discussion 933.
Score: 0.016