Michael Givel to Humans
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Michael Givel has written about Humans.
Connection Strength
0.357
-
Impact of tobacco industry and other corporations in the defeat of the 1994 Clinton health care plan. BMC Public Health. 2017 06 21; 17(1):591.
Score: 0.031
-
Campaign to counter a deteriorating consumer market: Philip Morris's Project Sunrise. Public Health. 2013 Feb; 127(2):134-42.
Score: 0.023
-
Behind the smokescreen: Native American tobacco use in Oklahoma. Int Q Community Health Educ. 2012-2013; 33(3):305-18.
Score: 0.021
-
History of Bhutan's prohibition of cigarettes: implications for neo-prohibitionists and their critics. Int J Drug Policy. 2011 Jul; 22(4):306-10.
Score: 0.021
-
In search of the less hazardous cigarette. Int J Health Serv. 2011; 41(1):77-94.
Score: 0.020
-
Policy and health implications of using the U.S. Food and Drug Administration product design approach in reducing tobacco product risk. Curr Drug Abuse Rev. 2008 Jun; 1(2):135-41.
Score: 0.017
-
Public policy implications of tobacco industry smuggling through Native American reservations into Canada. Int J Health Serv. 2008; 38(3):471-87.
Score: 0.016
-
FDA legislation. Tob Control. 2007 Aug; 16(4):217-8.
Score: 0.016
-
Consent and counter-mobilization: the case of the national smokers alliance. J Health Commun. 2007 Jun; 12(4):339-57.
Score: 0.015
-
A comparison of the impact of U.S. and Canadian cigarette pack warning label requirements on tobacco industry profitability and the public health. Health Policy. 2007 Oct; 83(2-3):343-52.
Score: 0.015
-
Limited state progress in regulating secondhand tobacco smoke. Int J Health Serv. 2007; 37(3):469-76.
Score: 0.015
-
Motivation of chemical industry social responsibility through Responsible Care. Health Policy. 2007 Apr; 81(1):85-92.
Score: 0.014
-
Neoliberal and public health effects of failing to adopt OSHA's national secondhand tobacco smoke rule. Int J Health Serv. 2006; 36(1):137-55.
Score: 0.014
-
Supporting real advances in public health through FDA regulation. J Public Health Policy. 2006; 27(1):119-20.
Score: 0.014
-
Philip Morris' FDA gambit: good for public health? J Public Health Policy. 2005 Dec; 26(4):450-68.
Score: 0.014
-
Tobacco industry opposition to designating environmental tobacco smoke through E-codes. J Public Health Policy. 2005 Apr; 26(1):75-89.
Score: 0.013
-
Oklahoma tobacco policy-making. J Okla State Med Assoc. 2005 Mar; 98(3):89-94.
Score: 0.013
-
The "global settlement" with the tobacco industry: 6 years later. Am J Public Health. 2004 Feb; 94(2):218-24.
Score: 0.012
-
A comparison of US and Norwegian regulation of coumarin in tobacco products. Tob Control. 2003 Dec; 12(4):401-5.
Score: 0.012
-
State tobacco settlement funds not being spent on vigorous tobacco control efforts. Oncology (Williston Park). 2002 Feb; 16(2):152, 155-7.
Score: 0.011
-
Tobacco lobby political influence on US state legislatures in the 1990s. Tob Control. 2001 Jun; 10(2):124-34.
Score: 0.010
-
Failure to defend a successful state tobacco control program: policy lessons from Florida. Am J Public Health. 2000 May; 90(5):762-7.
Score: 0.009
-
Tobacco control and direct democracy in Dade County, Florida: future implications for health advocates. J Public Health Policy. 2000; 21(3):268-95.
Score: 0.009