THIS IS A DEVELOPMENT VERSION OF PROFILES. PLEASE GO TO THE PRODUCTION ENVIRONMENT FOR UPDATES

Header Logo

Connection

Gary Raskob to Injections, Subcutaneous

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Gary Raskob has written about Injections, Subcutaneous.
Connection Strength

0.717
  1. Comparison of idrabiotaparinux with vitamin K antagonists for prevention of thromboembolism in patients with atrial fibrillation: the Borealis-Atrial Fibrillation Study. J Thromb Haemost. 2014 Jun; 12(6):824-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.116
  2. Apixaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after hip or knee replacement: pooled analysis of major venous thromboembolism and bleeding in 8464 patients from the ADVANCE-2 and ADVANCE-3 trials. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Feb; 94(2):257-64.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.099
  3. Oral direct factor Xa inhibition with edoxaban for thromboprophylaxis after elective total hip replacement. A randomised double-blind dose-response study. Thromb Haemost. 2010 Sep; 104(3):642-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.089
  4. Extended prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism with idraparinux. N Engl J Med. 2007 Sep 13; 357(11):1105-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.073
  5. Timing of initial administration of low-molecular-weight heparin prophylaxis against deep vein thrombosis in patients following elective hip arthroplasty: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med. 2001 Sep 10; 161(16):1952-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  6. Abelacimab for Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism. N Engl J Med. 2021 08 12; 385(7):609-617.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  7. The economic impact of treating deep vein thrombosis with low-molecular-weight heparin: outcome of therapy and health economy aspects. Haemostasis. 1998; 28 Suppl 3:8-16.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  8. Apixaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after hip replacement. N Engl J Med. 2010 Dec 23; 363(26):2487-98.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  9. Oral rivaroxaban for symptomatic venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med. 2010 Dec 23; 363(26):2499-510.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  10. Apixaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after knee replacement (ADVANCE-2): a randomised double-blind trial. Lancet. 2010 Mar 06; 375(9717):807-15.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  11. Home therapy of venous thrombosis with long-term LMWH versus usual care: patient satisfaction and post-thrombotic syndrome. Am J Med. 2009 Aug; 122(8):762-769.e3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  12. Antithrombotic therapy for venous thromboembolic disease: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Chest. 2008 Jun; 133(6 Suppl):454S-545S.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  13. Oral thrombin inhibitor dabigatran etexilate vs North American enoxaparin regimen for prevention of venous thromboembolism after knee arthroplasty surgery. J Arthroplasty. 2009 Jan; 24(1):1-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  14. Subcutaneous fondaparinux versus intravenous unfractionated heparin in the initial treatment of pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med. 2003 Oct 30; 349(18):1695-702.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  15. Dose-response study of recombinant factor VIIa/tissue factor inhibitor recombinant nematode anticoagulant protein c2 in prevention of postoperative venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing total knee replacement. Circulation. 2001 Jul 03; 104(1):74-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  16. Low-molecular-weight heparin vs heparin in the treatment of patients with pulmonary embolism. American-Canadian Thrombosis Study Group. Arch Intern Med. 2000 Jan 24; 160(2):229-36.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  17. The importance of initial heparin treatment on long-term clinical outcomes of antithrombotic therapy. The emerging theme of delayed recurrence. Arch Intern Med. 1997 Nov 10; 157(20):2317-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  18. Treatment of proximal vein thrombosis with subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin vs intravenous heparin. An economic perspective. Arch Intern Med. 1997 Feb 10; 157(3):289-94.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  19. Subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin vs warfarin for prophylaxis of deep vein thrombosis after hip or knee implantation. An economic perspective. Arch Intern Med. 1997 Feb 10; 157(3):298-303.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  20. A comparison of subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin with warfarin sodium for prophylaxis against deep-vein thrombosis after hip or knee implantation. N Engl J Med. 1993 Nov 04; 329(19):1370-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  21. Subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin compared with continuous intravenous heparin in the treatment of proximal-vein thrombosis. N Engl J Med. 1992 Apr 09; 326(15):975-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  22. Continuous intravenous heparin compared with intermittent subcutaneous heparin in the initial treatment of proximal-vein thrombosis. N Engl J Med. 1986 Oct 30; 315(18):1109-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.

THIS IS A DEVELOPMENT VERSION OF PROFILES. PLEASE GO TO THE PRODUCTION ENVIRONMENT FOR UPDATES