THIS IS A DEVELOPMENT VERSION OF PROFILES. PLEASE GO TO THE PRODUCTION ENVIRONMENT FOR UPDATES

Header Logo

Connection

Michael Detamore to Animals

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Michael Detamore has written about Animals.
Connection Strength

3.008
  1. Comparison of the chondrogenic potential of eBMSCs and eUCMSCs in response to selected peptides and compounds. BMC Vet Res. 2025 Feb 17; 21(1):70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.092
  2. Regenerative Engineering of a Biphasic Patient-Fitted Temporomandibular Joint Condylar Prosthesis. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2023 07; 29(7):307-320.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.082
  3. Independent control of molecular weight, concentration, and stiffness of hyaluronic acid hydrogels. Biomed Mater. 2022 09 15; 17(6).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.078
  4. Automated Decellularization of Musculoskeletal Tissues with High Extracellular Matrix Retention. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2022 04; 28(4):137-147.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.075
  5. Conductive and injectable hyaluronic acid/gelatin/gold nanorod hydrogels for enhanced surgical translation and bioprinting. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2022 02; 110(2):365-382.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.072
  6. Standardization of Microcomputed Tomography for Tracheal Tissue Engineering Analysis. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2020 11; 26(11):590-595.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.068
  7. Biodegradable electrospun patch containing cell adhesion or antimicrobial compounds for trachea repair in vivo. Biomed Mater. 2020 02 17; 15(2):025003.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.065
  8. Thiolated bone and tendon tissue particles covalently bound in hydrogels for in vivo calvarial bone regeneration. Acta Biomater. 2020 03 01; 104:66-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.064
  9. Effects of a Bioactive SPPEPS Peptide on Chondrogenic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Ann Biomed Eng. 2019 Nov; 47(11):2308-2321.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  10. Development and quantitative characterization of the precursor rheology of hyaluronic acid hydrogels for bioprinting. Acta Biomater. 2019 09 01; 95:176-187.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.060
  11. Chondroinductive Peptides: Drawing Inspirations from Cell-Matrix Interactions. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2019 06; 25(3):249-257.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  12. Reinforced Electrospun Polycaprolactone Nanofibers for Tracheal Repair in an In Vivo Ovine Model. Tissue Eng Part A. 2018 09; 24(17-18):1301-1308.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.057
  13. Effects of tissue processing on bioactivity of cartilage matrix-based hydrogels encapsulating osteoconductive particles. Biomed Mater. 2018 03 16; 13(3):034108.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.057
  14. Superior calvarial bone regeneration using pentenoate-functionalized hyaluronic acid hydrogels with devitalized tendon particles. Acta Biomater. 2018 04 15; 71:148-155.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.057
  15. Preclinical Animal Models for Temporomandibular Joint Tissue Engineering. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2018 06; 24(3):171-178.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  16. Microsphere-Based Scaffolds in Regenerative Engineering. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2017 06 21; 19:135-161.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  17. In vivo evaluation of stem cell aggregates on osteochondral regeneration. J Orthop Res. 2017 08; 35(8):1606-1616.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  18. Cartilage extracellular matrix as a biomaterial for cartilage regeneration. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2016 11; 1383(1):139-159.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  19. Microsphere-based scaffolds encapsulating chondroitin sulfate or decellularized cartilage. J Biomater Appl. 2016 09; 31(3):328-43.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  20. Microsphere-based scaffolds encapsulating tricalcium phosphate and hydroxyapatite for bone regeneration. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2016 Jul; 27(7):121.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  21. Approaching the compressive modulus of articular cartilage with a decellularized cartilage-based hydrogel. Acta Biomater. 2016 07 01; 38:94-105.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  22. Chondroinduction from Naturally Derived Cartilage Matrix: A Comparison Between Devitalized and Decellularized Cartilage Encapsulated in Hydrogel Pastes. Tissue Eng Part A. 2016 Apr; 22(7-8):665-79.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  23. Chondroinductive Hydrogel Pastes Composed of Naturally Derived Devitalized Cartilage. Ann Biomed Eng. 2016 06; 44(6):1863-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  24. Stem Cells in Aggregate Form to Enhance Chondrogenesis in Hydrogels. PLoS One. 2015; 10(12):e0141479.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  25. Microsphere-based gradient implants for osteochondral regeneration: a long-term study in sheep. Regen Med. 2015; 10(6):709-28.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  26. Functional Reconstruction of Tracheal Defects by Protein-Loaded, Cell-Seeded, Fibrous Constructs in Rabbits. Tissue Eng Part A. 2015 Sep; 21(17-18):2390-403.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  27. Decellularized cartilage may be a chondroinductive material for osteochondral tissue engineering. PLoS One. 2015; 10(5):e0121966.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  28. Nonviral Reprogramming of Human Wharton's Jelly Cells Reveals Differences Between ATOH1 Homologues. Tissue Eng Part A. 2015 Jun; 21(11-12):1795-809.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  29. Bioactive Microsphere-Based Scaffolds Containing Decellularized Cartilage. Macromol Biosci. 2015 Jul; 15(7):979-89.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  30. Enabling Surgical Placement of Hydrogels Through Achieving Paste-Like Rheological Behavior in Hydrogel Precursor Solutions. Ann Biomed Eng. 2015 Oct; 43(10):2569-76.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  31. Endochondral ossification for enhancing bone regeneration: converging native extracellular matrix biomaterials and developmental engineering in vivo. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2015 Jun; 21(3):247-66.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  32. The bioactivity of cartilage extracellular matrix in articular cartilage regeneration. Adv Healthc Mater. 2015 Jan 07; 4(1):29-39.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  33. Evaluation of apparent fracture toughness of articular cartilage and hydrogels. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2017 01; 11(1):121-128.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  34. The bioactivity of agarose-PEGDA interpenetrating network hydrogels with covalently immobilized RGD peptides and physically entrapped aggrecan. Biomaterials. 2014 Apr; 35(11):3558-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  35. The potential of encapsulating "raw materials" in 3D osteochondral gradient scaffolds. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2014 Apr; 111(4):829-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  36. Subcritical CO2 sintering of microspheres of different polymeric materials to fabricate scaffolds for tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2013 Dec 01; 33(8):4892-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  37. Tuning mechanical performance of poly(ethylene glycol) and agarose interpenetrating network hydrogels for cartilage tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2013 Nov; 34(33):8241-57.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  38. Mechanical testing of hydrogels in cartilage tissue engineering: beyond the compressive modulus. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2013 Oct; 19(5):403-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  39. Incorporation of aggrecan in interpenetrating network hydrogels to improve cellular performance for cartilage tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part A. 2013 Jun; 19(11-12):1349-59.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  40. The future of carbon dioxide for polymer processing in tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2013 Jun; 19(3):221-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  41. Physical non-viral gene delivery methods for tissue engineering. Ann Biomed Eng. 2013 Mar; 41(3):446-68.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  42. Leveraging "raw materials" as building blocks and bioactive signals in regenerative medicine. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2012 Oct; 18(5):341-62.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  43. Using chondroitin sulfate to improve the viability and biosynthesis of chondrocytes encapsulated in interpenetrating network (IPN) hydrogels of agarose and poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2012 Jan; 23(1):157-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  44. Osteochondral interface regeneration of the rabbit knee with macroscopic gradients of bioactive signals. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2012 Jan; 100(1):162-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  45. Continuous gradients of material composition and growth factors for effective regeneration of the osteochondral interface. Tissue Eng Part A. 2011 Nov; 17(21-22):2845-55.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  46. Overview of tracheal tissue engineering: clinical need drives the laboratory approach. Ann Biomed Eng. 2011 Aug; 39(8):2091-113.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  47. Osteochondral interface regeneration of rabbit mandibular condyle with bioactive signal gradients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Jun; 69(6):e50-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  48. Biomimetic method for combining the nucleus pulposus and annulus fibrosus for intervertebral disc tissue engineering. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2011 Aug; 5(8):e179-87.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  49. Microsphere-based scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering: using subcritical CO(2) as a sintering agent. Acta Biomater. 2010 Jan; 6(1):137-43.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  50. Stress relaxation behavior of mandibular condylar cartilage under high-strain compression. J Biomech Eng. 2009 Jun; 131(6):061008.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  51. Biomechanical properties of the mandibular condylar cartilage and their relevance to the TMJ disc. J Biomech. 2009 Mar 11; 42(4):405-17.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  52. Regional dynamic tensile properties of the TMJ disc. J Dent Res. 2008 Nov; 87(11):1053-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  53. Hyaline cartilage cells outperform mandibular condylar cartilage cells in a TMJ fibrocartilage tissue engineering application. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2009 Mar; 17(3):346-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  54. Effects of growth factors and glucosamine on porcine mandibular condylar cartilage cells and hyaline cartilage cells for tissue engineering applications. Arch Oral Biol. 2009 Jan; 54(1):1-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  55. Tensile properties of the mandibular condylar cartilage. J Biomech Eng. 2008 Feb; 130(1):011009.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  56. Tissue engineering the mandibular condyle. Tissue Eng. 2007 Aug; 13(8):1955-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  57. Cell type and distribution in the porcine temporomandibular joint disc. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006 Feb; 64(2):243-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  58. Use of a rotating bioreactor toward tissue engineering the temporomandibular joint disc. Tissue Eng. 2005 Jul-Aug; 11(7-8):1188-97.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  59. Evaluation of three growth factors for TMJ disc tissue engineering. Ann Biomed Eng. 2005 Mar; 33(3):383-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  60. Quantitative analysis and comparative regional investigation of the extracellular matrix of the porcine temporomandibular joint disc. Matrix Biol. 2005 Feb; 24(1):45-57.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  61. Effects of growth factors on temporomandibular joint disc cells. Arch Oral Biol. 2004 Jul; 49(7):577-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  62. Motivation, characterization, and strategy for tissue engineering the temporomandibular joint disc. Tissue Eng. 2003 Dec; 9(6):1065-87.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  63. Tensile properties of the porcine temporomandibular joint disc. J Biomech Eng. 2003 Aug; 125(4):558-65.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  64. Unrepaired decompressive craniectomy worsens motor performance in a rat traumatic brain injury model. Sci Rep. 2020 12 17; 10(1):22242.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  65. Manifestations of Apprehension and Anxiety in a Sprague Dawley Cranial Defect Model. J Craniofac Surg. 2020 Nov/Dec; 31(8):2364-2367.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  66. A Protocol for Decellularizing Mouse Cochleae for Inner Ear Tissue Engineering. J Vis Exp. 2018 01 01; (131).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  67. Exploiting decellularized cochleae as scaffolds for inner ear tissue engineering. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2017 02 28; 8(1):41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  68. Colloidal Gels with Extracellular Matrix Particles and Growth Factors for Bone Regeneration in Critical Size Rat Calvarial Defects. AAPS J. 2017 05; 19(3):703-711.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  69. Species-specific effects of aortic valve decellularization. Acta Biomater. 2017 03 01; 50:249-258.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  70. Nanoengineered biomaterials for repair and regeneration of orthopedic tissue interfaces. Acta Biomater. 2016 09 15; 42:2-17.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  71. Emerging Trends in Biomaterials Research. Ann Biomed Eng. 2016 06; 44(6):1861-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  72. Engineering and commercialization of human-device interfaces, from bone to brain. Biomaterials. 2016 07; 95:35-46.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  73. Effect of pre-stress on the dynamic tensile behavior of the TMJ disc. J Biomech Eng. 2014 Jan; 136(1):011001.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  74. Hierarchically designed agarose and poly(ethylene glycol) interpenetrating network hydrogels for cartilage tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2010 Dec; 16(6):1533-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  75. Injectable PLGA based colloidal gels for zero-order dexamethasone release in cranial defects. Biomaterials. 2010 Jun; 31(18):4980-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  76. Microsphere-based seamless scaffolds containing macroscopic gradients of encapsulated factors for tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2008 Dec; 14(4):299-309.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  77. Lubrication of the temporomandibular joint. Ann Biomed Eng. 2008 Jan; 36(1):14-29.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.

THIS IS A DEVELOPMENT VERSION OF PROFILES. PLEASE GO TO THE PRODUCTION ENVIRONMENT FOR UPDATES