THIS IS A DEVELOPMENT VERSION OF PROFILES. PLEASE GO TO THE PRODUCTION ENVIRONMENT FOR UPDATES

Header Logo

Connection

Joan Walker to Prospective Studies

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Joan Walker has written about Prospective Studies.
Connection Strength

0.420
  1. Recurrence and survival after random assignment to laparoscopy versus laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group LAP2 Study. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Mar 01; 30(7):695-700.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.076
  2. Predicting absolute risk of CIN3 during post-colposcopic follow-up: results from the ASCUS-LSIL Triage Study (ALTS). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Aug; 195(2):341-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  3. Patient-reported outcome changes at the end of life in recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer: An NRG oncology/GOG study. Gynecol Oncol. 2021 11; 163(2):392-397.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  4. Post hoc analyses of GOG 9923: Does BRCA status affect toxicities?: An NRG oncology study. Gynecol Oncol. 2021 05; 161(2):512-515.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  5. GOG 244 - The Lymphedema and Gynecologic cancer (LeG) study: The impact of lower-extremity lymphedema on quality of life, psychological adjustment, physical disability, and function. Gynecol Oncol. 2021 01; 160(1):244-251.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  6. Prospective follow-up of quality of life for participants undergoing risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy or ovarian cancer screening in GOG-0199: An NRG Oncology/GOG study. Gynecol Oncol. 2020 01; 156(1):131-139.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  7. Randomized phase IIB evaluation of weekly paclitaxel versus weekly paclitaxel with oncolytic reovirus (Reolysin®) in recurrent ovarian, tubal, or peritoneal cancer: An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol. 2017 09; 146(3):477-483.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  8. Factors associated with deciding between risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy and ovarian cancer screening among high-risk women enrolled in GOG-0199: An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol. 2017 04; 145(1):122-129.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  9. Patient and physician factors associated with participation in cervical and uterine cancer trials: an NRG/GOG247 study. Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Jul; 138(1):101-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  10. Phase II trial of vaginal cuff brachytherapy followed by chemotherapy in early stage endometrial cancer patients with high-intermediate risk factors. Gynecol Oncol. 2014 Jan; 132(1):50-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  11. Gynecologic Oncology Group risk groups for vulvar carcinoma: improvement in survival in the modern era. Gynecol Oncol. 2007 Sep; 106(3):521-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  12. Hormonal contraceptive use, pregnancy and parity, and the risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3 among oncogenic HPV DNA-positive women with equivocal or mildly abnormal cytology. Int J Cancer. 2005 Dec 20; 117(6):1007-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  13. Outpatient implantation of a central venous access system in gynecologic oncology patients. J Reprod Med. 2003 Nov; 48(11):875-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  14. Method and timing of tumor volume measurement for outcome prediction in cervical cancer using magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002 Jan 01; 52(1):14-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  15. Cost analysis of Hickman catheter insertion at bedside in gynecologic oncology patients. J Am Coll Surg. 1994 Nov; 179(5):558-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.

THIS IS A DEVELOPMENT VERSION OF PROFILES. PLEASE GO TO THE PRODUCTION ENVIRONMENT FOR UPDATES