THIS IS A DEVELOPMENT VERSION OF PROFILES. PLEASE GO TO THE PRODUCTION ENVIRONMENT FOR UPDATES

Header Logo

Connection

Joan Walker to Treatment Outcome

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Joan Walker has written about Treatment Outcome.
Connection Strength

0.406
  1. Pathologic and Treatment Outcomes Among a Geriatric Population of Endometrial Cancer Patients: An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group Ancillary Data Analysis of LAP2. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2017 05; 27(4):730-737.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.091
  2. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy requires expertise and should be the standard of care for optimally surgically resected epithelial ovarian cancer patients. Ann Oncol. 2013 Dec; 24 Suppl 10:x41-45.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.072
  3. Intraperitoneal catheter outcomes in a phase III trial of intravenous versus intraperitoneal chemotherapy in optimal stage III ovarian and primary peritoneal cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Gynecol Oncol. 2006 Jan; 100(1):27-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  4. A Surgical Window Trial Evaluating Medroxyprogesterone Acetate with or without Entinostat in Patients with Endometrial Cancer and Validation of Biomarkers of Cellular Response. Clin Cancer Res. 2021 05 15; 27(10):2734-2741.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  5. Standardization of lower extremity quantitative lymphedema measurements and associated patient-reported outcomes in gynecologic cancers. Gynecol Oncol. 2021 02; 160(2):625-632.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  6. Lapatinib and potential prognostic value of EGFR mutations in a Gynecologic Oncology Group phase II trial of persistent or recurrent endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Nov; 127(2):345-50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  7. Low-dose abdominal radiation as a docetaxel chemosensitizer for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer: a phase I study of the Gynecologic Oncology Group. Gynecol Oncol. 2011 Feb; 120(2):224-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  8. Stage IVB endometrial cancer: does applying an ovarian cancer treatment paradigm result in similar outcomes? A case-control analysis. Gynecol Oncol. 2009 Feb; 112(2):337-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  9. A randomized phase III trial of VH fibrin sealant to reduce lymphedema after inguinal lymph node dissection: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol. 2008 Jul; 110(1):76-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  10. Extraperitoneal para-aortic lymph node evaluation for cervical cancer via pfannenstiel incision: technique and peri-operative outcomes. Gynecol Oncol. 2008 Mar; 108(3):466-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  11. Comparison of outcome measures in patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva treated with surgery or primary chemoradiation. Gynecol Oncol. 2008 Mar; 108(3):584-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  12. Radiation therapy with or without weekly cisplatin for bulky stage 1B cervical carcinoma: follow-up of a Gynecologic Oncology Group trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Nov; 197(5):503.e1-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  13. Pathologic findings and outcomes for octogenarians presenting with uterine malignancy. Gynecol Oncol. 2007 Sep; 106(3):572-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  14. Gynecologic Oncology Group risk groups for vulvar carcinoma: improvement in survival in the modern era. Gynecol Oncol. 2007 Sep; 106(3):521-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  15. Radiation therapy with concomitant paclitaxel and cisplatin chemotherapy in cervical carcinoma limited to the pelvis: a phase I/II study of the Gynecologic Oncology Group. Gynecol Oncol. 2006 Dec; 103(3):1038-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  16. Carcinosarcoma of the ovary-a case series. Gynecol Oncol. 2006 Jan; 100(1):128-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  17. A comparison of stages IB1 and IB2 cervical cancers treated with radical hysterectomy. Is size the real difference? Gynecol Oncol. 2004 Oct; 95(1):70-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.

THIS IS A DEVELOPMENT VERSION OF PROFILES. PLEASE GO TO THE PRODUCTION ENVIRONMENT FOR UPDATES