THIS IS A DEVELOPMENT VERSION OF PROFILES. PLEASE GO TO THE PRODUCTION ENVIRONMENT FOR UPDATES

Header Logo

Connection

Michael Megaly to Myocardial Infarction

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Michael Megaly has written about Myocardial Infarction.
Connection Strength

8.222
  1. Early vs. delayed mechanical circulatory support in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2024 May 28; 13(5):390-397.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.745
  2. Use of a Multidisciplinary Shock Team and Inhospital Mortality in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock. Am J Cardiol. 2023 11 01; 206:200-201.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.709
  3. Meta-Analysis on Invasive Versus Conservative Strategy in Patients Older Than Seventy Years With Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2023 01 01; 186:66-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.668
  4. Utilization of Non-Drug-Eluting Devices for Inpatient Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the United States. Am J Cardiol. 2023 01 01; 186:209-215.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.668
  5. Extraplaque versus intraplaque tracking in chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 11; 100(6):1021-1029.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.663
  6. Trends and Outcomes of Myocardial Infarction in Patients With Previous Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery. Am J Cardiol. 2022 09 15; 179:11-17.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.655
  7. Comparative Analysis of Patient Characteristics in Cardiogenic Shock Studies: Differences Between Trials and Registries. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 02 14; 15(3):297-304.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.636
  8. Outcomes of successful vs. failed contemporary chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2022 Jul; 37(3):483-489.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.623
  9. Diabetic Patients Who Present With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2022 05; 38:89-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.613
  10. Outcomes With Drug-Coated Balloons vs. Drug-Eluting Stents in Small-Vessel Coronary Artery Disease. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2022 02; 35:76-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.597
  11. Systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcomes with drug-coated balloons vs. stenting in acute myocardial infarction. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2021 Oct; 36(4):481-489.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.579
  12. Outcomes of Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Patients With Previous Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery. Am J Cardiol. 2023 10 15; 205:40-49.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.176
  13. Outcomes and Institutional Variation in Arterial Access Among Patients With AMI and Cardiogenic Shock Undergoing PCI. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 06 26; 16(12):1517-1528.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.175
  14. The impact of moderate aortic stenosis in acute myocardial infarction: A multicenter retrospective study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 07; 102(1):159-165.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.173
  15. Meta-Analysis on Transcarotid Versus Transfemoral and Other Alternate Accesses for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation. Am J Cardiol. 2023 04 01; 192:196-205.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.171
  16. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. J Invasive Cardiol. 2022 11; 34(11):E763-E775.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.166
  17. Outcomes with retrograde versus antegrade chronic total occlusion revascularization. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 11; 96(5):1037-1043.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.136
  18. Impact of Successful Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Interventions on Subsequent Clinical Outcomes. J Invasive Cardiol. 2020 Nov; 32(11):433-439.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  19. Meta-Analysis Comparing Percutaneous to Surgical Access in Trans-Femoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation. Am J Cardiol. 2020 04 15; 125(8):1239-1248.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.

THIS IS A DEVELOPMENT VERSION OF PROFILES. PLEASE GO TO THE PRODUCTION ENVIRONMENT FOR UPDATES